+1(781)975-1541
support-global@metwarebio.com

Volcano Plots in Metabolomics & Proteomics: Interpretation, Cutoffs, and Best Practices

Volcano plots are a compact way to visualize differential analysis results across thousands of metabolites or proteins. By combining effect size (log₂ fold change) and statistical evidence (−log₁₀ p or q), they surface variables with large, reliable differences between conditions—ideal for screening candidates, generating pathway hypotheses, and communicating results in figures.

 

What Is a Volcano Plot

A volcano plot is a scatter plot where each point represents a measured feature (e.g., a metabolite or protein) and how its abundance differs between two groups.

  • x-axis (log₂ fold change): magnitude and direction of change (right = upregulated; left = downregulated).
  • y-axis (−log₁₀ p or q): statistical significance (higher = stronger evidence after testing).

Features with both large effect size and strong statistical support tend to appear in the upper-right (upregulated) or upper-left (downregulated) regions.

 

How to Interpret: Axes, Cutoffs, and Significant Regions

Locate the center (log₂FC ≈ 0). Variables near zero show little change.

Scan vertically. Higher points indicate stronger statistical evidence (smaller p/q).

Scan horizontally. Points farther from zero indicate larger effect sizes.

Combine both. Upper-left/upper-right areas often contain the most promising candidates.

Check direction. Right = higher in the test group; left = lower.

Common cutoffs (example):

  • Effect size: |log₂FC| ≥ 1 (≈ 2-fold)
  • Significance: q < 0.05 (Benjamini–Hochberg FDR)

On the plot, draw a horizontal line at −log₁₀(q cutoff) and vertical lines at the log₂FC cutoffs. Predefine thresholds in your analysis plan and keep them consistent across figures.

 

Key Statistics Behind Volcano Plots

Fold change (FC) and log₂FC: report both direction and magnitude; log scaling centers symmetry around 0.

p-value vs. q-value: use q-values (FDR-adjusted) for ranking and on-figure thresholds to control false positives under multiple testing.

Effect size & confidence: statistical significance alone can be misleading with large n. Consider reporting effect sizes with CIs where appropriate.

Multiple testing: control via Benjamini–Hochberg (or alternatives suited to the design).

Dependencies for meaningful interpretation: adequate normalization, batch correction, appropriate imputation for missing values, and a design with sufficient power.

 

Customization & Annotation for Better Insight

Color coding: Distinguish significant up/down features (e.g., warm vs. cool tones). For accessibility, consider color-blind-safe palettes and/or shape/opacity cues.

Annotations: Label sentinel metabolites/proteins (top by |log₂FC| and q) and provide tooltips in interactive views.

Consistent styling: Standardize axis labels, legends, title conventions, and threshold lines across figures.

Export options: Prepare both raster (PNG) for web and vector (PDF/SVG) for publication.

 

Common Pitfalls & QC Checklist

Frequent issues

  • Small sample sizes inflate variance and destabilize p/q estimates.
  • Inadequate normalization or unaddressed batch effects distort both FC and significance.
  • Imputation choices (e.g., constant/LOD imputation) can bias log₂FC—document methods.
  • Threshold hacking: altering cutoffs post hoc to “catch” favorites undermines reproducibility.
  • Over-reliance on p without considering biological relevance and effect size.
  • Small-n and imbalanced designs. With few replicates, variance estimates are unstable and q-values can swing. Use variance-moderating models, assess power where possible, avoid aggressive imputation, and prefer conservative FDR. For imbalanced groups, check leverage and consider precision weights; verify findings with sensitivity analyses and, ideally, external validation.

QC checklist (use before plotting)

  • Assess signal drift and apply QC-based normalization if applicable.
  • Evaluate batch effects (e.g., PCA trends) and correct (e.g., ComBat, RUV).
  • Decide on imputation strategy consistent with data missingness mechanism.
  • Pre-register cutoffs and statistical model; document n, covariates, and contrasts.
  • Confirm FDR control and report both q-values and effect sizes.

 

Volcano vs MA vs Manhattan vs VIP–FC

Note: A standard volcano plot uses −log₁₀(p or q) on the y-axis. VIP–FC (PLS-DA) scatter is a separate visualization for model-based variable ranking and should not be labeled a volcano plot.

Plot

Best for

Axes

Strengths

Limitations

Typical keywords

Volcano plot

Two-group differential analysis in metabolomics/proteomics

x = log₂FC; y = −log₁₀(p or q)

Intuitive “magnitude + significance”; fast hit prioritization

Univariate focus; requires proper FDR control

volcano plot metabolomics, proteomics volcano plot, fold change vs p-value, adjusted p-value

MA plot

Intensity-dependent effects & QC

x = mean abundance (A); y = log₂FC (M)

Reveals intensity bias; complements normalization checks

No direct p/q view; must pair with stats

MA plot vs volcano, mean-difference plot, intensity bias

Manhattan plot

GWAS/association scans

x = genomic position; y = −log₁₀(p)

Genome-wide view across loci

Not for fold change; domain-specific

Manhattan vs volcano, GWAS visualization

VIP–FC scatter

Variable ranking from PLS-DA

x = log₂FC; y = VIP

Highlights model-important variables

Model-dependent; not a volcano plot

VIP vs p-value, PLS-DA VIP

 

Applications in Omics: From Screening to Pathway Hypotheses

Volcano plots help triage features into upregulated (upper-right), downregulated (upper-left), and not significant (bottom center), streamlining:

  • Biomarker screening and candidate selection
  • Pathway hypothesis generation and enrichment (e.g., KEGG, GO)
  • Panel building for downstream verification (e.g., PRM/SRM, targeted metabolomics)

Micro-case 1 (Proteomics, Drug Treatment).

A kinase inhibitor vs. DMSO in a cancer cell line (balanced replicates). With normalization and FDR at q<0.05, ~30 phosphoproteins with |log₂FC|>1 cluster in the right arm and enrich MAPK signaling. Five sentinel targets are annotated; follow-up PRM prioritizes four for verification. Pathway analysis suggests MAPK suppression with compensatory PI3K activity.

Volcano plot showing upregulated phosphoproteins under a kinase inhibitor with log2 fold change and −log10(q-value) thresholds.

Figure 1. Volcano plot (proteomics, kinase inhibitor vs DMSO). Points show log₂ fold change vs −log₁₀(q-value). Vertical lines: |log₂FC| = 1; horizontal line: q = 0.05. Sentinel phosphoproteins in the right arm are annotated; candidates enrich MAPK signaling.
 

Micro-case 2 (Metabolomics, Disease vs. Healthy).

Untargeted plasma profiling indicates a left-arm cluster of bile acid conjugates (lower in cases) and a right-arm group of acylcarnitines (higher in cases). A three-metabolite panel reaches cross-validated AUC ≈ 0.87 (external validation recommended). Enrichment points to β-oxidation and bile acid metabolism for follow-up.

Volcano plot for differential metabolite analysis with bile-acid conjugates downregulated and acylcarnitines upregulated, using log2 fold change and −log10(q-value).

Figure 2. Volcano plot (metabolomics, disease vs healthy). Left arm highlights downregulated bile-acid conjugates; right arm highlights upregulated acylcarnitines. Thresholds: |log₂FC| = 1; q = 0.05.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What does a volcano plot show in metabolomics?
A: It visualizes which metabolites differ between groups by combining log₂FC (magnitude/direction) and −log₁₀ p/q (evidence), helping prioritize biologically relevant changes.

Q2: What thresholds should I use?
A: A common starting point is |log₂FC| ≥ 1 and q < 0.05, but adjust based on study goals, sample size, expected effect sizes, and validation plans.

Q3: Should I use p or q on the y-axis?
A: Prefer q-values to reflect multiple-testing control; report both when space allows.

Q4: How does a volcano plot help in proteomics?
A: It highlights proteins with large, statistically supported changes across conditions, accelerating target triage for verification (e.g., PRM/SRM) and pathway analysis.

Q5: What sample size is reasonable?
A: There is no one-size-fits-all. Use power calculations where possible; designs with adequate replicates and batch control yield more stable effect sizes and q-values.

 

Volcano plots offer an intuitive, statistically grounded lens for discovering meaningful changes in large-scale omics datasets. When coupled with proper normalization, FDR control, and effect-size reporting—and complemented by MA plots, PCA/PLS-DA, and enrichment—they provide a solid bridge from visualization to biological insight.

Try it in Metware Cloud: import data, set FC/q cutoffs, annotate key features, and export publication-ready figures in minutes. Contact our team for guidance on normalization, batch correction, or downstream pathway analysis. 

 

Read more

Contact Us
Name can't be empty
Email error!
Message can't be empty
CONTACT FOR DEMO

Next-Generation Omics Solutions:
Proteomics & Metabolomics

Have a project in mind? Tell us about your research, and our team will design a customized proteomics or metabolomics plan to support your goals.
Ready to get started? Submit your inquiry or contact us at support-global@metwarebio.com.
Name can't be empty
Email error!
Message can't be empty
CONTACT FOR DEMO
+1(781)975-1541
LET'S STAY IN TOUCH
submit
Copyright © 2025 Metware Biotechnology Inc. All Rights Reserved.
support-global@metwarebio.com +1(781)975-1541
8A Henshaw Street, Woburn, MA 01801
Contact Us Now
Name can't be empty
Email error!
Message can't be empty
support-global@metwarebio.com +1(781)975-1541
8A Henshaw Street, Woburn, MA 01801
Register Now
Name can't be empty
Email error!
Message can't be empty